@CloudExpo Authors: Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, Liz McMillan, Yeshim Deniz, Zakia Bouachraoui

Related Topics: @CloudExpo, Microservices Expo, Machine Learning

@CloudExpo: Blog Feed Post

What's in a Cloud, Anyway?

Funny thing about the hype-cycle surrounding cloud, it just doesn’t seem to be slowing down

Funny thing about the hype-cycle surrounding cloud, it just doesn’t seem to be slowing down. Indeed, some are clinging to it like it was their long lost child – it in this case being the hype cycle, not the concept of cloud.

But seriously, lets consider exactly what is in a “cloud” anyway. Because a small percentage of enterprises are even considering it, and a huge percentage of chatter is dedicated to it, and I’m willing to do my part to stop the hype and start the help.

The “Cloud” is someone else’s data center running your app. Yeah, it really is that simple. Software As A Service evolved.

The hype-sters will no doubt howl about this with the following (and maybe more) chants - “reliability!” – because Salesforce.com didn’t have that already? “redundancy!” – because “redundant data center” didn’t mean anything? “Agility!” because you can’t spin up another VM in your own data center?

Lori was telling me today that an associate from our writing days asked her if F5 does anything special for the cloud. The answer to that would be “why?” Anything useful for the cloud is useful for redundant data centers, virtualized data centers, or both. Everything I can think of – even something as cool as iSessions or iRules – that we might do for the cloud isn’t “special for the cloud”, it’s useful in and of itself and one of the applications would be the cloud. Indeed, routing via iRules has been around since long before I was an F5er, so cloud really is just a new application of an existing technology.

So if you’re interested and want to delve past the hype, “the cloud” means moving all or part of your application to someone else’s data center and letting them worry about uptime, etc. While many will wrap a ton of verbiage around claiming there’s more to it, from an enterprise IT perspective there still isn’t. If your web farm got over-burdened you would bring up another instance and put it behind your load balancer or ADC (that would be a BIG-IP of course), which is what a cloud provider would do. The difference being that you’d pay your staff to do this work, and in the cloud you pay them to do it. Staff being a sunk cost, this might not be your best option. So make certain you know what you’re about when moving work to the cloud.

As I’ve said before, there are cases where the cloud makes a whole lot of sense, and cases where it makes zero sense. Your job as IT is to get past the screaming fits of those who have bet their future on the concept consuming the world and figure out which situations really do make sense for you. For a starter project, I’d run with a self-contained app that sees a large variance in usage – spikes and valleys – to see the real benefits of the cloud in action. Stand-alone is just a simple precaution, because network connections do go down, and an app that must have access to your data center in order to run has a totally different set of failure parameters that aren’t shared in a stand-alone app. Keep it simple in the first run.

The real beneficiaries of cloud will be those without a huge IT infrastructure already in place. Sure it’s a monthly expense, but so is hiring a staff and putting in all the gear, if you’re starting out, the cloud has to look appealing. I just want to see things move along far enough that there are some “moving clouds” success stories out there, because services in a hyped market have a tendency to want to lock you in somehow, and it’s tough to know how bad that will be until we have some serious movement under our belts. Simply put, service contracts are not forever, and “agility”, one of the many supposed benefits of the cloud, had best apply to your ability to move between vendors to best suit your needs, or the industry will suffer.

So take the hype with a grain of salt, understand your needs, understand what you’re getting into, and do what’s best for your organization. Beware those counseling radical change, after all, you have a business to support, and any radical change can severely impact your ability to do so.

Until next time,


Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By Don MacVittie

Don MacVittie is founder of Ingrained Technology, A technical advocacy and software development consultancy. He has experience in application development, architecture, infrastructure, technical writing,DevOps, and IT management. MacVittie holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Northern Michigan University, and an M.S. in Computer Science from Nova Southeastern University.

CloudEXPO Stories
A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to great conferences, helping you discover new conferences and increase your return on investment.
Using new techniques of information modeling, indexing, and processing, new cloud-based systems can support cloud-based workloads previously not possible for high-throughput insurance, banking, and case-based applications. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, John Newton, CTO, Founder and Chairman of Alfresco, described how to scale cloud-based content management repositories to store, manage, and retrieve billions of documents and related information with fast and linear scalability. He addressed the challenges of scaling document repositories to this level; architectural approaches for coordinating data; search and storage technologies, Solr, and Amazon storage and database technologies; the breadth of use cases that modern content systems need to support; how to support user applications that require subsecond response times.
Poor data quality and analytics drive down business value. In fact, Gartner estimated that the average financial impact of poor data quality on organizations is $9.7 million per year. But bad data is much more than a cost center. By eroding trust in information, analytics and the business decisions based on these, it is a serious impediment to digital transformation.
With more than 30 Kubernetes solutions in the marketplace, it's tempting to think Kubernetes and the vendor ecosystem has solved the problem of operationalizing containers at scale or of automatically managing the elasticity of the underlying infrastructure that these solutions need to be truly scalable. Far from it. There are at least six major pain points that companies experience when they try to deploy and run Kubernetes in their complex environments. In this presentation, the speaker will detail these pain points and explain how cloud can address them.
Containers and Kubernetes allow for code portability across on-premise VMs, bare metal, or multiple cloud provider environments. Yet, despite this portability promise, developers may include configuration and application definitions that constrain or even eliminate application portability. In this session we'll describe best practices for "configuration as code" in a Kubernetes environment. We will demonstrate how a properly constructed containerized app can be deployed to both Amazon and Azure using the Kublr platform, and how Kubernetes objects, such as persistent volumes, ingress rules, and services, can be used to abstract from the infrastructure.