Cloud computing is transforming the way businesses think about and leverage technology. As a result, the general understanding of cloud computing has come a long way in a short time. However, there are still many misconceptions about what cloud computing is and what it can do for businesses that adopt this game-changing computing model.
In his General Session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Gene Eun, Senior Director, Oracle Cloud at Oracle, will discuss and dispel some of the common myth...| By Business Wire | Article Rating: |
|
| November 7, 2012 07:15 AM EST | Reads: |
366 |
Sonus Networks, Inc. (Nasdaq: SONS), a global leader in SIP communications, today announced results for the third quarter ended September 28, 2012.
Results are reported on a consolidated basis and include the partial quarter financial effect of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (“NET”), an acquisition which closed on August 24, 2012. A table providing stand-alone Sonus and stand-alone NET results is provided in the supplementary financial data on the IR page of the Company’s website.
Third Quarter Consolidated 2012 Highlights (including NET)
- Total revenue was $57.0 million.
- Total SBC revenue, including maintenance and services, was $25.4 million, compared to $19.1 million in the second quarter of 2012 and $13.9 million in the third quarter of 2011.
- SBC product revenue was $20.4 million, compared to $13.5 million in the second quarter of 2012 and $10.4 million in the third quarter of 2011.
- SBC product revenue was a record 61% of total product revenue.
- Won 40 new customers in the quarter, 11 for Sonus and 29 for NET (post-acquisition).
- Sonus SBC 5100 and Sonus SBC 5200 Certified in Microsoft's Unified Communications Open Interoperability Program for Microsoft Lync Server 2010; together with Sonus SBC 1000 and Sonus SBC 2000 represents the largest portfolio of MS Lync certified SBCs on the market.
Revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2012 was $57.0 million, compared to $57.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and $66.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The GAAP net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2012 was $15.6 million, or $0.06 per share, compared to a GAAP net loss of $11.7 million, or $0.04 per share, in the second quarter of 2012 and GAAP net income of $1.9 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The non-GAAP net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2012 was $6.3 million, or $0.02 per share, compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $8.6 million, or $0.03 per share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and non-GAAP net income of $4.1 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.
2012 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Outlook
The Company’s outlook is based on current indications for its business, which may change during the current quarter. All figures are non-GAAP and include the partial quarter effect of NET in the third quarter of 2012 and the anticipated full quarter effect of NET in the fourth quarter of 2012. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP to GAAP outlook and a statement on the use of non-GAAP financial measures are included at the end of this press release.
|
Fourth Quarter 2012 |
Current Guidance |
||||
| Total Revenue | $77 to $81 million | ||||
| SBC Total Revenue | $25 to $26 million | ||||
| SBC Product Revenue | $21 to $22 million | ||||
|
NET Total Revenue (incl. in Total Revenue)
NET SBC Total Revenue (incl. in SBC Total Revenue) |
$10 million
$4 million |
||||
| Gross Margin | 58% | ||||
| Operating Expenses | $44 to $45 million | ||||
| Diluted EPS | $0.00 to $0.01 | ||||
| Cash & Investments | $270 million | ||||
| Diluted shares | 282 million | ||||
|
Full Year 2012 |
Current Guidance |
||||
| Total Revenue | $256 to $260 million | ||||
| SBC Total Revenue | $87 to $88 million | ||||
| SBC Product Revenue | $68 to $69 million | ||||
|
NET Total Revenue (incl. in Total Revenue)
NET SBC Total Revenue (incl. in SBC Total Revenue) |
$17 million
$6 million |
||||
| Gross Margin | 60% | ||||
| Operating Expenses | $170 to $171 million | ||||
| Basic EPS | $(0.06) to $(0.07) | ||||
| Cash & Investments | $270 million | ||||
| Diluted shares | 280 million |
Restructuring
In August 2012, the Company initiated a plan to streamline operations and reduce operating costs, including a corporate-wide restructuring plan. In the third quarter of fiscal 2012 the Company recorded restructuring expenses of $2.0 million for severance and related expenses and the consolidation of its France offices. The Company expects to record additional restructuring expenses of $6.0 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, comprised of approximately $5 million for facility-related charges and $1 million for severance and other related charges.
Quote
“Sonus proved this quarter that our SBC growth engine is continuing to grow faster than the market. We continue to compete very effectively and grow our market share,” said Ray Dolan, President and Chief Executive Officer. “This continued momentum will enable us to more rapidly transition our business from legacy Media Gateway toward a profitable SBC growth company.”
Conference Call Details
Date: November 7, 2012
Time: 8:30 am (ET)
Dial-in number: 800
908 8402
International Callers: +1 212 231 2936
Replay information:
A telephone playback of the call will be available shortly following the conference call until November 21, 2012 and can be accessed by calling 800 633 8284 or +1 402 977 9140 for international callers. The reservation number for the replay is 21606654. A webcast replay of the conference call will also be available shortly following the conference call on the Company’s Investor Relations Web site in the Events & Presentations – Archived Events section.
Accounting Period:
As of the beginning of fiscal 2012, the Company began reporting its first, second and third quarters on a 4-4-5 basis, with the quarter ending on the Friday closest to the last day of each third month. The Company's fiscal year-end is December 31.
Tags:
Sonus Networks, Sonus, SONS, 2012 third quarter, earnings, results, IP-based network solutions, SBC, SBC 1000, SBC 2000, SBC 5100, SBC 5200, SBC 9000, session border controller, session border control, session management, SIP trunking, Cloud VoIP communications, unified communications, UC, VoIP, IP, TDM.
About Sonus Networks
Sonus helps the world's leading communications service providers and enterprises embrace the next generation of SIP-based solutions including VoIP, video and Unified Communications through secure, reliable and scalable IP networks. With customers around the globe and 15 years of experience transforming networks to IP, Sonus has enabled service providers to capture and retain users and both service providers and enterprises to generate significant ROI. Sonus products include session border controllers, policy/routing servers, subscriber feature servers and media and signaling gateways. Sonus products are supported by a global services team with experience in design, deployment and maintenance of some of the world's largest and most complex IP networks. For more information, visit www.sonus.net or call 1-855-GO-SONUS.
Important Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The information in this release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “anticipates”, “believes”, “could”, “estimates”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “seeks”, “projects” and other similar language, whether in the negative or affirmative, are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.
Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: plans, objectives, outlook, goals, strategies, future events or performance, growth in market share, trends, investments, customer growth, operational performance and costs, liquidity and financial positions, competition, estimated expenditures and investments, impacts of laws, rules and regulations, revenues and earnings, performance and other statements that are other than statements of historical facts. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, the timing of our recognition of revenues; our ability to recruit and retain key personnel; difficulties supporting our new strategic focus on channel sales; difficulties retaining and expanding our customer base; difficulties leveraging market opportunities; restructuring activities; our ability to realize benefits from acquisitions (including with respect to our acquisition of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc.); litigation; actions taken by significant stockholders; difficulties providing solutions that meet the needs of customers; market acceptance of our products and services; rapid technological and market change; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; our ability to maintain partner, reseller, distribution and vendor support and supply relationships; higher risks in international operations and markets; the impact of increased competition; currency fluctuations; changes in the market price of our common stock; and/or failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in these forward-looking statements are discussed in Part I, Item 2 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations", Part I, Item 3 "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" and Part II, Item 1A "Risk Factors" in the Company's most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law. We therefore caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
Sonus is a registered trademark of Sonus Networks, Inc. All other company and product names may be trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated.
Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Sonus management uses a number of different financial measures, both GAAP and non-GAAP, in analyzing and assessing the overall performance of the business, making operating decisions, planning and forecasting future periods, and determining payments under compensation programs. Our annual financial plan is prepared both on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis, and the non-GAAP annual financial plan is approved by our board of directors. Continuous budgeting and forecasting for revenue and expenses are conducted on a consistent non-GAAP basis (in addition to GAAP) and actual results on a non-GAAP basis are assessed against the annual financial plan. We consider the use of non-GAAP financial measures helpful in assessing the core performance of our continuing operations and liquidity, and when planning and forecasting future periods. By continuing operations we mean the ongoing results of the business excluding certain costs, including, but not limited to: stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, depreciation expense related to the fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment, acquisition-related costs and restructuring. We also consider the use of non-GAAP earnings per share helpful in assessing the organic performance of the continuing operations of our business. By organic performance we mean performance as if we had owned an acquired business in the same period a year ago. While our management uses these non-GAAP financial measures as a tool to enhance their understanding of certain aspects of our financial performance, our management does not consider these measures to be a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP measures. In addition, our presentations of these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered alternatives for, or in isolation from, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Investors are cautioned that there are material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures as an analytical tool. In particular, many of the adjustments to Sonus’ financial measures reflect the exclusion of items that are recurring and will be reflected in our financial results for the foreseeable future.
Stock-based compensation is different from other forms of compensation, as it is a non-cash expense. For example, a cash salary generally has a fixed and unvarying cash cost. In contrast, the expense associated with an equity-based award is generally unrelated to the amount of cash ultimately received by the employee, and the cost to us is based on a stock-based compensation valuation methodology and underlying assumptions that may vary over time. We believe that excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expense from our operating results facilitates the ability of readers of our financial statements to compare our operating results to our historical results and to other companies in our industry.
We exclude the amortization of acquired intangible assets from non-GAAP expense and income measures. These amounts are inconsistent in amount and frequency and are significantly impacted by the timing and size of acquisitions. Although we exclude amortization of acquired intangible assets from our non-GAAP expenses, we believe that it is important for investors to understand that intangible assets contribute to revenue generation. We believe that excluding the non-cash amortization of intangible assets facilitates the comparison of our financial results to our historical operating results and to other companies in our industry as if the acquired intangible assets had been developed internally rather than acquired, and provides meaningful information regarding our liquidity.
As part of the assessment of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the NET acquisition, we were required to increase the aggregate fair value of acquired property and equipment by $2.0 million. The acquired property and equipment is being depreciated over a weighted average useful life of approximately 2.5 years. We believe that excluding the incremental depreciation expense resulting from the fair value write-up of this acquired property and equipment facilitates the comparison of our operating results to our historical results and to other companies in our industry.
We consider certain transition, integration and other acquisition-related costs to be unpredictable and dependent on a significant number of factors that may be outside of our control. We do not consider these acquisition-related costs to be related to the organic continuing operations of the acquired business and accordingly, we believe they are generally not relevant in assessing or estimating the long-term performance of the acquired assets. In addition, the size, complexity and/or volume of an acquisition, which often drives the magnitude of acquisition-related costs, may not be indicative of such future costs. By excluding acquisition-related costs from our non-GAAP measures, management is able to evaluate our ability to utilize our existing assets and estimate the long-term value that acquired assets will generate for the Company.
We recorded $2.0 million of restructuring expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and expect to record approximately $6 million of restructuring expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 for facilities associated with the continuing integration of NET, severance and related costs. We believe that excluding restructuring expenses facilitates the comparison of our financial results to our historical operating results and to other companies in our industry and provides meaningful information regarding our liquidity.
We believe that providing non-GAAP information to investors, in addition to the GAAP presentation, will allow investors to view the financial results in the way management views the operating results. We further believe that providing this information helps investors to better understand our financial performance and evaluate the efficacy of the methodology and information used by our management to evaluate and measure such performance.
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | ||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
| September 28, | June 29, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
| Product | $ | 33,520 | $ | 32,586 | $ | 41,892 | ||||||||||
| Service | 23,529 | 25,024 | 24,461 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 57,049 | 57,610 | 66,353 | |||||||||||||
| Cost of revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
| Product | 11,768 | 11,027 | 11,504 | |||||||||||||
| Service | 12,839 | 13,788 | 12,633 | |||||||||||||
| Total cost of revenue | 24,607 | 24,815 | 24,137 | |||||||||||||
| Gross profit | 32,442 | 32,795 | 42,216 | |||||||||||||
| Gross margin: | ||||||||||||||||
| Product | 64.9 | % | 66.2 | % | 72.5 | % | ||||||||||
| Service | 45.4 | % | 44.9 | % | 48.4 | % | ||||||||||
| Total gross margin | 56.9 | % | 56.9 | % | 63.6 | % | ||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | 15,612 | 17,095 | 16,231 | |||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 17,613 | 18,141 | 14,651 | |||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 7,939 | 8,384 | 10,133 | |||||||||||||
| Acquisition-related | 4,090 | 967 | - | |||||||||||||
| Restructuring | 1,992 | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 47,246 | 44,587 | 41,015 | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | (14,804 | ) | (11,792 | ) | 1,201 | |||||||||||
| Interest income, net | 20 | 222 | 269 | |||||||||||||
| Other expense, net | (2 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | (14,786 | ) | (11,570 | ) | 1,470 | |||||||||||
| Income tax (provision) benefit | (833 | ) | (155 | ) | 439 | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (15,619 | ) | $ | (11,725 | ) | $ | 1,909 | ||||||||
| Earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||||||||
| Diluted | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||||||||
| Shares used to compute earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 280,145 | 279,926 | 278,721 | |||||||||||||
| Diluted | 280,145 | 279,926 | 279,324 | |||||||||||||
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | |||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts) | |||||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||||
| Nine months ended | |||||||||||
| September 28, | September 30, | ||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Revenue: | |||||||||||
| Product | $ | 107,517 | $ | 107,291 | |||||||
| Service | 71,481 | 78,133 | |||||||||
| Total revenue | 178,998 | 185,424 | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue: | |||||||||||
| Product | 31,988 | 44,283 | |||||||||
| Service | 40,019 | 42,364 | |||||||||
| Total cost of revenue | 72,007 | 86,647 | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 106,991 | 98,777 | |||||||||
| Gross margin: | |||||||||||
| Product | 70.2 | % | 58.7 | % | |||||||
| Service | 44.0 | % | 45.8 | % | |||||||
| Total gross margin | 59.8 | % | 53.3 | % | |||||||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||||||
| Research and development | 51,094 | 47,026 | |||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 56,339 | 42,246 | |||||||||
| General and administrative | 25,302 | 26,526 | |||||||||
| Acquisition-related | 5,057 | - | |||||||||
| Restructuring | 1,992 | - | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 139,784 | 115,798 | |||||||||
| Loss from operations | (32,793 | ) | (17,021 | ) | |||||||
| Interest income, net | 457 | 1,036 | |||||||||
| Other expense, net | (2 | ) | - | ||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (32,338 | ) | (15,985 | ) | |||||||
| Income tax provision | (1,444 | ) | (448 | ) | |||||||
| Net loss | $ | (33,782 | ) | $ | (16,433 | ) | |||||
| Loss per share: | |||||||||||
| Basic | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | |||||
| Diluted | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | |||||
| Shares used to compute loss per share: | |||||||||||
| Basic | 279,854 | 278,286 | |||||||||
| Diluted | 279,854 | 278,286 | |||||||||
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | ||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||
| September 28, | December 31, | |||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 72,608 | $ | 105,451 | ||||||
| Marketable securities | 206,614 | 224,090 | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | 46,638 | 53,126 | ||||||||
| Inventory | 21,253 | 15,434 | ||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 751 | 486 | ||||||||
| Other current assets | 21,605 | 12,246 | ||||||||
| Total current assets | 369,469 | 410,833 | ||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 25,452 | 22,084 | ||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | 17,106 | 1,200 | ||||||||
| Goodwill | 34,563 | 5,062 | ||||||||
| Investments | 24,058 | 55,427 | ||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 1,708 | 1,137 | ||||||||
| Other assets | 14,464 | 8,972 | ||||||||
| $ | 486,820 | $ | 504,715 | |||||||
| Liabilities and stockholders' equity | ||||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 14,114 | $ | 12,754 | ||||||
| Accrued expenses | 24,313 | 21,620 | ||||||||
| Current portion of deferred revenue | 32,722 | 38,565 | ||||||||
| Current portion of convertible subordinated note | 8,120 | - | ||||||||
| Current portion of other long-term liabilities | 1,469 | 1,275 | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | 80,738 | 74,214 | ||||||||
| Deferred revenue | 9,568 | 11,601 | ||||||||
| Long-term portion of convertible subordinated note | 2,380 | - | ||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 3,471 | 3,599 | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | 96,157 | 89,414 | ||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||||
| Stockholders equity: | ||||||||||
| Common stock | 281 | 279 | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,319,113 | 1,309,919 | ||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | (935,986 | ) | (902,204 | ) | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | 7,255 | 7,307 | ||||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 390,663 | 415,301 | ||||||||
| $ | 486,820 | $ | 504,715 | |||||||
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | |||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||||
| Nine months ended | |||||||||||
| September 28, | September 30, | ||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (33,782 | ) | $ | (16,433 | ) | |||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flows used in operating activities: | |||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 9,081 | 8,721 | |||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 904 | 300 | |||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | 6,540 | 6,308 | |||||||||
| Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 23 | 14 | |||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | 13,020 | 8,762 | |||||||||
| Inventory | (3,868 | ) | 19,113 | ||||||||
| Other operating assets | (4,998 | ) | 9,763 | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | (1,753 | ) | (7,234 | ) | |||||||
| Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities | (3,625 | ) | (12,046 | ) | |||||||
| Deferred revenue | (9,624 | ) | (33,477 | ) | |||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | (28,082 | ) | (16,209 | ) | |||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||
| Purchases of property and equipment | (7,792 | ) | (10,962 | ) | |||||||
| Business acquisition, net of cash acquired | (35,508 | ) | - | ||||||||
| Purchases of marketable securities | (139,917 | ) | (152,402 | ) | |||||||
| Sale/maturities of marketable securities | 200,380 | 192,769 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by investing activities | 17,163 | 29,405 | |||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of common stock in connection with employee stock purchase plan | 1,693 | 1,513 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 151 | 818 | |||||||||
| Payment of tax withholding obligations related to net share settlements of restricted stock awards | (169 | ) | (1,245 | ) | |||||||
| Principal payments of capital lease obligations | (87 | ) | (66 | ) | |||||||
| Settlement of redeemable convertible subordinated debentures | (23,704 | ) | - | ||||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (22,116 | ) | 1,020 | ||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 192 | (445 | ) | ||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (32,843 | ) | 13,771 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 105,451 | 62,501 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 72,608 | $ | 76,272 | |||||||
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | |||||||||
| Supplemental Information | |||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||
| The following tables provide the details of stock-based compensation and amortization of intangible assets included in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and the line items in which these amounts are reported. | |||||||||
| Three months ended | |||||||||
|
September 28, |
June 29, | September 30, | |||||||
| 2012 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Stock-based compensation | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue - product | $ | 41 | $ | 36 | $ | 100 | |||
| Cost of revenue - service | 211 | 209 | 258 | ||||||
| Cost of revenue | 252 | 245 | 358 | ||||||
| Research and development expense | 524 | 633 | 505 | ||||||
| Sales and marketing expense | 500 | 491 | 408 | ||||||
| General and administrative expense | 1,124 | 654 | 796 | ||||||
| Operating expense | 2,148 | 1,778 | 1,709 | ||||||
| Total stock-based compensation | $ | 2,400 | $ | 2,023 | $ | 2,067 | |||
| Amortization of intangible assets | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue - product | $ | 428 | $ | - | $ | - | |||
| Research and development | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||
| Sales and marketing | 176 | - | - | ||||||
| Operating expense | 276 | 100 | 100 | ||||||
| Total amortization of intangible assets | $ | 704 | $ | 100 | $ | 100 | |||
| Nine months ended | |||||||||
| September 28, | September 30, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue - product | $ | 130 | $ | 317 | |||||
| Cost of revenue - service | 595 | 1,032 | |||||||
| Cost of revenue | 725 | 1,349 | |||||||
| Research and development | 1,773 | 1,565 | |||||||
| Sales and marketing | 1,458 | 1,468 | |||||||
| General and administrative | 2,584 | 1,926 | |||||||
| Operating expense | 5,815 | 4,959 | |||||||
| Total stock-based compensation | $ | 6,540 | $ | 6,308 | |||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue - product | $ | 428 | $ | - | |||||
| Research and development | 300 | 300 | |||||||
| Sales and marketing | 176 | - | |||||||
| Operating expense | 476 | 300 | |||||||
| Total amortization of intangible assets | $ | 904 | $ | 300 | |||||
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | ||
| Statement on the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and | ||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP to GAAP Financial Measures | ||
| (unaudited) | ||
| To supplement its condensed consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"), the Company discloses certain non-GAAP financial measures, including Gross margin - product, Gross margin - service, Total gross profit, Total gross margin, Research and development expense, Sales and marketing expense, General and administrative expense, Operating expenses, Income (loss) from operations, Net income (loss), and Income (loss) per share. These non-GAAP financial measures are not presented in accordance with, nor are they intended to be a substitute for, GAAP. In addition, our presentations of these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered alternatives for, or in isolation from, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. | ||
| We use a number of different financial measures, both GAAP and non-GAAP, in analyzing and assessing the overall performance of our business, making operating decisions, planning and forecasting future periods, and determining payments under compensation programs. We consider the use of these non-GAAP financial measures helpful in assessing the core performance of our continuing operations and liquidity, and when planning and forecasting future periods. We define continuing operations as the ongoing revenues and expenses of the business, excluding certain items. These excluded items for the periods presented are stock-based compensation expense, amortization of intangible assets, depreciation expense related to the fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment, acquisition-related costs and restructuring. We do not include any income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments as we were unable to recognize a tax benefit on domestic losses incurred in any of the periods presented; accordingly, no adjustment to income taxes for non-GAAP items is required. | ||
| Investors are cautioned that there are material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures as an analytical tool. In particular, many of the adjustments to the Company's GAAP financial measures reflect the exclusion of items that are recurring and will be reflected in the Company's financial results for the foreseeable future. | ||
| Stock-Based Compensation | ||
| Stock-based compensation is different from other forms of compensation, as it is a non-cash expense. For example, a cash salary generally has a fixed and unvarying cash cost. In contrast, the expense associated with an equity-based award is generally unrelated to the amount of cash ultimately received by the employee, and the cost to us is based on a stock-based compensation valuation methodology and underlying assumptions that may vary over time. We believe that excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expense from our operating results facilitates the ability of readers of our financial statements to compare our operating results to our historical results and to other companies in our industry. | ||
| Amortization of Intangible Assets | ||
| On August 24, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (“NET”) for $41.5 million, or $1.35 per share of NET common stock. The transaction has been accounted for as a business combination and the financial results of NET have been included in our condensed consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to its acquisition. As part of the preliminary purchase price allocation, we recorded $16.8 million of identifiable intangible assets, comprised of developed technology, customer relationships, order backlog and internal use software, and $29.5 million of goodwill. We are amortizing the identifiable intangible assets in relation to the expected cash flows from the individual intangible assets over their respective useful lives, which range from 4 months to 7 years. The amortization of the developed technology, order backlog and internal use software intangible assets is being recorded as cost of revenue (product) and the amortization of the customer relationships is being recorded as sales and marketing expense. | ||
| On January 15, 2010, we entered into an intellectual property asset purchase and license agreement with Winphoria, Inc. (“Winphoria”) and Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”) to purchase certain of Winphoria’s software code and related patents and to license certain other intellectual property from Winphoria and Motorola. The purchase price included an initial payment of $2.0 million and future potential royalty payments dependent upon future sales of certain of our products that include the Winphoria technology that was purchased or licensed. In connection with this transaction we recorded identifiable intangible assets which we have classified as developed technology and that are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years, the expected useful life of the technology. The amortization expense for these identifiable intangible assets is charged to research and development expense. | ||
| We believe that excluding the non-cash amortization of intangible assets facilitates the comparison of our financial results to our historical operating results and to other companies in our industry, and provides meaningful information regarding our liquidity. | ||
| Depreciation Expense - Fair Value Write-up of Acquired Property and Equipment | ||
| As part of the assessment of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the NET acquisition, we were required to increase the aggregate fair value of acquired property and equipment by $2.0 million. The acquired property and equipment is being depreciated over a weighted average useful life of approximately 2.5 years. We believe that excluding the incremental depreciation expense resulting from the fair value write-up of this acquired property and equipment facilitates the ability of readers of our financial statements to compare our operating results to our historical results and to other companies in our industry. | ||
| Acquisition-Related Costs | ||
| We consider certain transition, integration and other acquisition-related costs to be unpredictable and dependent on a significant number of factors that may be outside of our control. We do not consider these acquisition-related costs to be related to the organic continuing operations of the acquired business and accordingly, we believe they are generally not relevant in assessing or estimating the long-term performance of the acquired assets. In addition, the size, complexity and/or volume of an acquisition, which often drives the magnitude of acquisition-related costs, may not be indicative of such future costs. By excluding acquisition-related costs from our non-GAAP measures, management is able to evaluate our ability to utilize our existing assets and estimate the long-term value that acquired assets will generate for the Company. | ||
| Restructuring | ||
| We recorded $2.0 million of restructuring expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and expect to record approximately $6 million of restructuring expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 for facilities associated with the continuing integration of NET, severance and related costs. We believe that excluding restructuring expenses facilitates the comparison of our financial results to our historical operating results and to other companies in our industry and provides meaningful information regarding our liquidity. | ||
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP and GAAP Financial Measures - Outlook | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages and per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Range | Range | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 77 | $ | 81 | $ | 256 | $ | 260 | ||||||||||||||
| Gross margin | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| GAAP outlook | 55.5 | % | 55.6 | % | 58.5 | % | 58.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 1.7 | % | 1.6 | % | 0.7 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP outlook | 58.0 | % | 58.0 | % | 60.0 | % | 60.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| GAAP outlook | $ | 53.4 | $ | 54.4 | $ | 192.9 | $ | 193.9 | ||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | (2.2 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (8.0 | ) | (8.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | (0.6 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (0.6 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisition-related costs | - | - | (5.1 | ) | (5.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring | (6.0 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (8.0 | ) | (8.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Non-GAAP outlook |
$ | 44.0 | $ | 45.0 | $ | 170.0 | $ | 171.0 | ||||||||||||||
| (Loss) earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| GAAP outlook | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | - | * | - | * | - | * | - | * | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisition-related costs | - | - | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP outlook | $ | - | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||||||||||||
| * Less than $0.01 impact on earnings per share. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP and GAAP Financial Measures - Historical | ||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
| September 28, | June 29, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| GAAP gross margin - product | 64.9 | % | 66.2 | % | 72.5 | % | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 1.3 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Non-GAAP gross margin - product | 66.3 | % | 66.3 | % | 72.8 | % | ||||||||||
| GAAP gross margin - service | 45.4 | % | 44.9 | % | 48.4 | % | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 0.9 | % | 0.8 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | 0.1 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Non-GAAP gross margin - service | 46.4 | % | 45.7 | % | 49.4 | % | ||||||||||
| GAAP total gross profit | $ | 32,442 | $ | 32,795 | $ | 42,216 | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 252 | 245 | 358 | |||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 428 | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | 33 | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP total gross profit | $ | 33,155 | $ | 33,040 | $ | 42,574 | ||||||||||
| GAAP total gross margin | 56.9 | % | 56.9 | % | 63.6 | % | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense % of revenue | 0.4 | % | 0.5 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets % of revenue | 0.8 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment % of revenue | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Non-GAAP total gross margin | 58.1 | % | 57.4 | % | 64.2 | % | ||||||||||
| GAAP research and development expense | $ | 15,612 | $ | 17,095 | $ | 16,231 | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | (524 | ) | (633 | ) | (505 | ) | ||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | (100 | ) | (100 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (89 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP research and development expense | $ | 14,899 | $ | 16,362 | $ | 15,626 | ||||||||||
| GAAP sales and marketing expense | $ | 17,613 | $ | 18,141 | $ | 14,651 | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | (500 | ) | (491 | ) | (408 | ) | ||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | (176 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (19 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP sales and marketing expense | $ | 16,918 | $ | 17,650 | $ | 14,243 | ||||||||||
| GAAP general and administrative expense | $ | 7,939 | $ | 8,384 | $ | 10,133 | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | (1,124 | ) | (654 | ) | (796 | ) | ||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (24 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP general and administrative expense | $ | 6,791 | $ | 7,730 | $ | 9,337 | ||||||||||
| GAAP operating expenses | $ | 47,246 | $ | 44,587 | $ | 41,015 | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | (2,148 | ) | (1,778 | ) | (1,709 | ) | ||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | (276 | ) | (100 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (132 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Acquisition-related expense | (4,090 | ) | (967 | ) | - | |||||||||||
| Restructuring | (1,992 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating expenses | $ | 38,608 | $ | 41,742 | $ | 39,206 | ||||||||||
| GAAP income (loss) from operations | $ | (14,804 | ) | $ | (11,792 | ) | $ | 1,201 | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 2,400 | 2,023 | 2,067 | |||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 704 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value of acquired property and equipment | 165 | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Acquisition-related expense | 4,090 | 967 | - | |||||||||||||
| Restructuring | 1,992 | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP income (loss) from operations | $ | (5,453 | ) | $ | (8,702 | ) | $ | 3,368 | ||||||||
| GAAP net income (loss) | $ | (15,619 | ) | $ | (11,725 | ) | $ | 1,909 | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 2,400 | 2,023 | 2,067 | |||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 704 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value of acquired property and equipment | 165 | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Acquisition-related expense | 4,090 | 967 | - | |||||||||||||
| Restructuring | 1,992 | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP net income (loss) | $ | (6,268 | ) | $ | (8,635 | ) | $ | 4,076 | ||||||||
| (Loss) per share/diluted earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||
| GAAP | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||||||||
| Shares used to compute (loss) per share/diluted earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||
| GAAP shares used to compute (loss) per share/diluted earnings per share | 280,145 | 279,926 | 279,324 | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP shares used to compute (loss) per share/diluted earnings per share | 280,145 | 279,926 | 279,324 | |||||||||||||
| SONUS NETWORKS, INC. | ||||||||||
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP and GAAP Financial Measures - Historical | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts) | ||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||
| Nine months ended | ||||||||||
| September 28, | September 30, | |||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
| GAAP gross margin - product | 70.2 | % | 58.7 | % | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 0.1 | % | 0.3 | % | ||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 0.4 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
| Non-GAAP gross margin - product | 70.7 | % | 59.0 | % | ||||||
| GAAP gross margin - service | 44.0 | % | 45.8 | % | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 0.8 | % | 1.3 | % | ||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
| Non-GAAP gross margin - service | 44.8 | % | 47.1 | % | ||||||
| GAAP total gross profit | $ | 106,991 | $ | 98,777 | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 725 | 1,349 | ||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 428 | - | ||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | 33 | - | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP total gross profit | $ | 108,177 | $ | 100,126 | ||||||
| GAAP total gross margin | 59.8 | % | 53.3 | % | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense % of revenue | 0.4 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets % of revenue | 0.2 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment % of revenue | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
| Non-GAAP total gross margin | 60.4 | % | 54.0 | % | ||||||
| GAAP research and development expense | $ | 51,094 | $ | 47,026 | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | (1,773 | ) | (1,565 | ) | ||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | (300 | ) | (300 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (89 | ) | - | |||||||
| Non-GAAP research and development expense | $ | 48,932 | $ | 45,161 | ||||||
| GAAP sales and marketing expense | $ | 56,339 | $ | 42,246 | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | (1,458 | ) | (1,468 | ) | ||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | (176 | ) | - | |||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (19 | ) | - | |||||||
| Non-GAAP sales and marketing expense | $ | 54,686 | $ | 40,778 | ||||||
| GAAP general and administrative expense | $ | 25,302 | $ | 26,526 | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | (2,584 | ) | (1,626 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (24 | ) | - | |||||||
| Non-GAAP general and administrative expense | $ | 22,694 | $ | 24,900 | ||||||
| GAAP operating expenses | $ | 139,784 | $ | 115,798 | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | (5,815 | ) | (4,959 | ) | ||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | (476 | ) | (300 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value write-up of acquired property and equipment | (132 | ) | - | |||||||
| Acquisition-related expense | (5,057 | ) | - | |||||||
| Restructuring | (1,992 | ) | - | |||||||
| Non-GAAP operating expenses | $ | 126,312 | $ | 110,539 | ||||||
| GAAP loss from operations | $ | (32,793 | ) | $ | (17,021 | ) | ||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 6,540 | 6,308 | ||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 904 | 300 | ||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value of acquired property and equipment | 165 | - | ||||||||
| Acquisition-related expense | 5,057 | - | ||||||||
| Restructuring | 1,992 | - | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP loss from operations | $ | (18,135 | ) | $ | (10,413 | ) | ||||
| GAAP net loss | $ | (33,782 | ) | $ | (16,433 | ) | ||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 6,540 | 6,308 | ||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 904 | 300 | ||||||||
| Depreciation expense - fair value of acquired property and equipment | 165 | - | ||||||||
| Acquisition-related expense | 5,057 | - | ||||||||
| Restructuring | 1,992 | - | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP net loss | $ | (19,124 | ) | $ | (9,825 | ) | ||||
|
Loss per share |
||||||||||
| GAAP | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||||
| Non-GAAP | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | ||||
| Shares used to compute loss per share | ||||||||||
| GAAP shares used to compute loss per share | 279,854 | 278,286 | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP shares used to compute loss per share | 279,854 | 278,286 | ||||||||
Published November 7, 2012 Reads 366
Copyright © 2012 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Business Wire
Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Cloud computing is transforming the way businesses think about and leverage technology. As a result, the general understanding of cloud computing has come a long way in a short time. However, there are still many misconceptions about what cloud computing is and what it can do for businesses that adopt this game-changing computing model.
In his General Session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Gene Eun, Senior Director, Oracle Cloud at Oracle, will discuss and dispel some of the common myth...May. 23, 2013 04:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,449 |
By Liz McMillan OpenStack Cells is one of the most anticipated features in Grizzly, the seventh release of the open source software that offers more block storage options and scalability. It has been running in production at Rackspace for more than a year.
In his session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Wayne Walls, OpenStack Developer Advocate at Rackspace Hosting, will discuss nova cells and how it is changing the way you design your cloud applications and infrastructure. He will explain how OpenStack ...May. 23, 2013 01:15 AM EDT Reads: 2,062 |
By Jeremy Geelan "Since Cloud Expo is running the week of June 10, we thought it'd be a great idea to schedule our Meetup this week. That way, if you have colleagues, friends, or family in town that week for the Expo, you can invite them to join you!" With those words, the OpenStack New York Meetup Group's organizer's launched a landing page this week where anyone interested can register for the June 12 evening event.May. 22, 2013 01:45 PM EDT Reads: 825 |
By Elizabeth White May. 22, 2013 01:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,015 |
By Pat Romanski “Open source has always provided a number of benefits, including easing adoption costs, propagating a better understanding of the technology, and allowing for faster evolution and commercialization of products and services based on it,” noted Terry Woloszyn, Founder & CEO, Leeward Security Ltd., in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “This is clearly evident with the OpenStack and CloudStack,” Woloszyn continued, “and others that have been quickly commercialized as...May. 22, 2013 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,217 |
By Liz McMillan SYS-CON Events announced today that OpenStack will exhibit at SYS-CON's 12th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 10–13, 2013, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York. OpenStack software controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed by a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
OpenStack powers some of the most widely-used SaaS app...May. 22, 2013 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 941 |
By Elizabeth White SYS-CON Events announced today that BUMI (Backup My Info!), the premium provider of managed online backup and recovery solutions for small to mid-sized businesses, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 12th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 10–13, 2013, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York.
Manhattan-based BUMI (Backup My Info!) is a premium managed service provider specializing in online data backup and recovery. Founded in 2002, the company's data backup and recovery serv...May. 22, 2013 10:59 AM EDT Reads: 586 |
By Pat Romanski SYS-CON Events announced today that nfina Technologies, a provider of highly reliable cloud server products, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 12th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 10–13, 2013, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York.
nfina Technologies develops, manufactures, and markets highly reliable cloud server products, designed to solve the most demanding data center requirements in mission-critical cloud applications. Nfina’s staff has decades of experience in co...May. 22, 2013 10:00 AM EDT Reads: 918 |
By Pat Romanski In his session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Dave Eichorn, Global Data Center Practice Head at Zensar, will share a case study describing how a utility services company handled the migration of its Microsoft platform to the cloud. Challenged with the time-consuming task of opening operations out of temporary offices, this company struggled with the need to simultaneously access data that was accumulated from a vast amount of data-intensive jobs. Zensar migrated the company’s application ...May. 22, 2013 09:54 AM EDT Reads: 767 |
By Liz McMillan “Social, mobile, analytics and cloud can’t be looked at as distinct technology trends; they are facets of the same movement and an everyday reality for consumers and businesses alike,” said Craig Sowell, IBM VP of SmartCloud Marketing, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “This means that businesses need to start looking at trends as one: cloud is the delivery, analytics is the unique insight, social is a shareable service, and mobile is the ubiquitous access.”
...May. 22, 2013 09:16 AM EDT Reads: 848 |
- Cloud People: A Who's Who of Cloud Computing
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Dave Linthicum – Cloud Technology Partners
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Is Changing the Economics of Business
- Windows Azure IaaS Reaches General Availability
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Nicos Vekiarides – TwinStrata
- AMD and Adobe Collaborate on Upcoming Version of Adobe Premiere Pro Software to Enable Breakthrough Video Editing Performance Through Open Standards
- State and Local Governments Adopt Microsoft Dynamics CRM to Improve Citizen Service Delivery
- Enterasys Spotlights SDN's Impact on Traditional Networking in Upcoming Webinar
- New Relic Q1 2013 Blazes Past Growth Targets and Reaches 40,000 Active Customer Accounts
- Best CIO Practices Shared from SHI’s Customers
- Cloud Expo New York: Deploying Hybrid Cloud for Performance and Uptime
- Cloud Expo New York: Delivering Digital Marketing on the Cloud
- Cloud People: A Who's Who of Cloud Computing
- Cloud Expo New York: Best CIO Practices Shared from SHI’s Customers
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Dave Linthicum – Cloud Technology Partners
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Is Changing the Economics of Business
- Cloud Expo New York: How to Use Google Apps Script
- Windows Azure IaaS Reaches General Availability
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Nicos Vekiarides – TwinStrata
- AMD and Adobe Collaborate on Upcoming Version of Adobe Premiere Pro Software to Enable Breakthrough Video Editing Performance Through Open Standards
- Cloud Computing Bootcamp at Cloud Expo New York
- State and Local Governments Adopt Microsoft Dynamics CRM to Improve Citizen Service Delivery
- Enterasys Spotlights SDN's Impact on Traditional Networking in Upcoming Webinar
- New Relic Q1 2013 Blazes Past Growth Targets and Reaches 40,000 Active Customer Accounts
- The Top 150 Players in Cloud Computing
- What is Cloud Computing?
- Six Benefits of Cloud Computing
- The Top 250 Players in the Cloud Computing Ecosystem
- Twenty-One Experts Define Cloud Computing
- What's the Difference Between Cloud Computing and SaaS?
- Virtualization Conference Keynote Webcast Live on SYS-CON.TV
- The Future of Cloud Computing
- A Brief History of Cloud Computing: Is the Cloud There Yet?
- GDS International: Global Warming Scam?
- Cloud Expo Europe 2009 in Prague: Themes & Topics
- Cloud Computing Expo 2009 West: Call for Papers Now Closed








OpenStack Cells is one of the most anticipated features in Grizzly, the seventh release of the open source software that offers more block storage options and scalability. It has been running in production at Rackspace for more than a year.
In his session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Wayne Walls, OpenStack Developer Advocate at Rackspace Hosting, will discuss nova cells and how it is changing the way you design your cloud applications and infrastructure. He will explain how OpenStack ...
"Since Cloud Expo is running the week of June 10, we thought it'd be a great idea to schedule our Meetup this week. That way, if you have colleagues, friends, or family in town that week for the Expo, you can invite them to join you!" With those words, the OpenStack New York Meetup Group's organizer's launched a landing page this week where anyone interested can register for the June 12 evening event.
“Open source has always provided a number of benefits, including easing adoption costs, propagating a better understanding of the technology, and allowing for faster evolution and commercialization of products and services based on it,” noted Terry Woloszyn, Founder & CEO, Leeward Security Ltd., in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “This is clearly evident with the OpenStack and CloudStack,” Woloszyn continued, “and others that have been quickly commercialized as...
SYS-CON Events announced today that OpenStack will exhibit at SYS-CON's 12th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 10–13, 2013, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York. OpenStack software controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed by a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
OpenStack powers some of the most widely-used SaaS app...
SYS-CON Events announced today that BUMI (Backup My Info!), the premium provider of managed online backup and recovery solutions for small to mid-sized businesses, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 12th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 10–13, 2013, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York.
Manhattan-based BUMI (Backup My Info!) is a premium managed service provider specializing in online data backup and recovery. Founded in 2002, the company's data backup and recovery serv...
SYS-CON Events announced today that nfina Technologies, a provider of highly reliable cloud server products, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 12th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 10–13, 2013, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York.
nfina Technologies develops, manufactures, and markets highly reliable cloud server products, designed to solve the most demanding data center requirements in mission-critical cloud applications. Nfina’s staff has decades of experience in co...
In his session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Dave Eichorn, Global Data Center Practice Head at Zensar, will share a case study describing how a utility services company handled the migration of its Microsoft platform to the cloud. Challenged with the time-consuming task of opening operations out of temporary offices, this company struggled with the need to simultaneously access data that was accumulated from a vast amount of data-intensive jobs. Zensar migrated the company’s application ...
“Social, mobile, analytics and cloud can’t be looked at as distinct technology trends; they are facets of the same movement and an everyday reality for consumers and businesses alike,” said Craig Sowell, IBM VP of SmartCloud Marketing, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “This means that businesses need to start looking at trends as one: cloud is the delivery, analytics is the unique insight, social is a shareable service, and mobile is the ubiquitous access.”
...
“The last time I checked, people do not change their social security numbers very often...”
While in constant debate over data encryption and ease of access, I encountered a train of thought that made my jaw drop. A tradeshow attendee suggested encrypting everything, but just use a weak algorithm; ...
Don and I have four children, all of whom have had the fortune to take piano lessons (I'm not sure if the youngest would agree he's fortunate at this point in his life but at five, he's not really able to answer the question with any degree of wisdom, anyway. Come to think of it, not sure the other ...
Our prior post, A Roadmap to High-Value Cloud Infrastructure: Disaster Recovery and Data Protection, discussed both the benefits and limitations of a cloud-based disaster recovery (DR) strategy. As we highlighted last week, traditional disaster recovery options leave open a huge hole: At one extreme...
Online collaboration has evolved during the last decade, delivering even greater value -- thanks to a new generation of business technology applications. Forbes Insights released "Collaborating in the Cloud," a Cisco-sponsored study examining the ways business leaders increasingly look at cloud coll...
New technologies allow schools, colleges and universities to analyze absolutely everything that happens. From student behavior, testing results, career development of students as well as educational needs based on changing societies. A lot of this data has already been stored and is used for statist...
A recent Gartner study states that the function of the modern CIO is in flux and that his or her future focus must incorporate digital assets (aka cloud-based data and applications) to remain relevant. Towards the goal of riding the sea change a compiler of stacks to a broker of business needs, secu...
In the coming years, big data will change the way organisations and societies are operated and managed. Big data however, is not the only trend that will impact significantly how organisations operate. Another major trend at the moment is gamification. Gamification will change the way organisations ...
We all talk about cloud differently, but is there a way we should be speaking about this tech?
Cloud computing is now a widely reported, if not accepted, IT movement that, depending on who you talk to, has changed or is changing the way businesses utilize infrastructure.
The age of data center automation is upon us. Whether it's cloud or SDN or devops in general, automation as a means to achieve efficiency and, one hopes, free up resources that can be then redirected to focus on innovation.
As is always the case when we begin to move further upwards, abstracting ...










