At pennies per virtual machine-hour, the economics of cloud computing are both compelling and daunting to replicate. Whether you are building your own cloud infrastructure, building a public cloud or choosing a cloud service, there are key strategy and technology decisions that make the difference between success and failure.
In his General Session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Jason Waxman, VP in the Intel Architecture Group and general manager of the Cloud Platforms Group within Inte...| By Business Wire | Article Rating: |
|
| February 12, 2013 04:02 PM EST | Reads: |
428 |
Learning and talent management software provider Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSOD) today announced results for its fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
“Through all of the consolidation that took place during 2012, our business continued to excel, and Cornerstone OnDemand is today the clear independent SaaS leader in learning and talent management,” said Adam Miller, the Company's President and CEO. “We are extremely proud of what our team was able to accomplish this past year. Our persistent drive to innovate has provided our clients with a best-of-breed, end-to-end talent management solution. With a truly global market opportunity, and our relentless focus on client success, we look forward to continued growth in the future.”
Revenue for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $36.4 million, representing a 63% increase compared to the same period in 2011. Non-GAAP revenue for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $36.7 million, representing a 64% increase compared to the same period in 2011.1 Revenue for the full fiscal year 2012 was $117.9 million, representing a 56% increase compared to gross revenue for the full fiscal year 2011.2 Non-GAAP revenue for the full fiscal year 2012 was $119.4 million, representing a 58% increase compared to the full fiscal year 2011.1
Bookings, which the Company defines as gross revenue plus the change in deferred revenue for the period, were $56.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2012, representing a 46% increase compared to the same period in 2011. 1 Bookings for the full fiscal year 2012 were $154.3 million, representing a 58% increase compared to the full fiscal year 2011.1 Deferred revenue at December 31, 2012 was $92.3 million, representing a 65% increase compared to the balance at December 31, 2011.
Gross profit for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $25.7 million, representing a 61% year-over-year increase compared to the same period in 2011.
Gross profit for the full fiscal year 2012 was $83.3 million, representing a 54% increase compared to gross profit for the full fiscal year 2011, based on gross revenue.2 Gross margin for the full fiscal year 2012 was 70.7%. On a non-GAAP basis, gross margin for the full fiscal year 2012 was 73.2%.1
The Company’s net loss for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $7.4 million, or $0.15 net loss per share. Non-GAAP net loss for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $2.9 million, or $0.06 net loss per share. Net loss for the full fiscal year 2012 was $31.4 million, or $0.63 net loss per share. Non-GAAP net loss for the full fiscal year 2012 was $16.0 million, or $0.32 net loss per share. Non-GAAP net loss is based on non-GAAP revenue and excludes, for the periods in which they are present, stock-based compensation and employer-related payroll taxes, amortization of intangible assets, acquisition costs, amortization of debt discount and issuance costs, early debt retirement expense, change in the fair value of preferred stock warrant liabilities, adjustments to taxes related to acquisition adjustments, and accretion related to preferred stock.1
During the fourth quarter of 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $14.1 million as compared to $4.9 million in the same period in 2011. For the full fiscal year 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $10.3 million as compared to $1.8 million for the full fiscal year 2011. At December 31, 2012, the Company’s total cash and cash equivalents were $76.4 million and accounts receivable were $47.5 million, yielding a total of approximately $124.0 million.
The Company ended the quarter with over 1,200 clients and over 10.5 million users, representing 53% and 41% year-over-year growth of the Company’s client base and users, respectively.3
| 1 | Non-GAAP revenue, bookings, non-GAAP net cash provided by operating activities, non-GAAP net loss, non-GAAP net loss per share, non-GAAP gross profit, and non-GAAP gross margin are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the discussion in the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and the reconciliations at the end of this release. Due to purchase accounting rules applicable to the acquisition of Sonar Limited we completed during the second quarter of 2012, the Company recorded an adjustment of $1.6 million to reduce to fair value the balance of deferred revenue attributable to contracts assumed from Sonar Limited. This fair value adjustment has the impact of reducing the amount of revenue attributable to contracts assumed from Sonar Limited by $0.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and $1.4 million for the full fiscal year 2012. Our non-GAAP revenue calculation adds back these fair value adjustments. | |
| 2 | Comparative year-over-year changes of revenue or gross profit uses gross revenue for the full fiscal year 2011. Gross revenue for the full fiscal year 2011 excludes the impact of a non-cash reduction of revenue related to a common stock warrant issued to ADP of $2.5 million. Net revenue and net loss for the full fiscal year 2011 was impacted by this non-cash reduction of revenue. | |
| 3 | Includes contracted clients and active users of any combination of our cloud-based solutions, excluding Cornerstone Small Business Solution, or “CSB”. |
Quarterly Conference Call
Cornerstone OnDemand will host a conference call to discuss its fourth quarter and fiscal year 2012 results at 2:00 p.m. PST (5:00 p.m. ET) today. A live audio webcast of the conference call, together with detailed financial information, can be accessed through the company’s Investor Relations Web site at http://investors.cornerstoneondemand.com/events.cfm. The live call can be accessed by dialing (888) 357-3694 (U.S.) or (973) 890-8276 (outside the U.S.) and referencing passcode: 92587407. A replay of the call will also be available at http://investors.cornerstoneondemand.com/events.cfm or via telephone until 11:59 p.m. PST on February 16, 2013 by dialing (855) 859-2056 (U.S.) or (404) 537-3406 (outside the U.S.), and referencing passcode: 92587407.
About Cornerstone OnDemand
Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. is a leading global provider of comprehensive learning and talent management solutions. We enable organizations to meet the challenges they face in empowering their people and maximizing the productivity of their human capital. Our integrated software-as-a-service (SaaS) solution consists of the Cornerstone Recruiting Cloud, the Cornerstone Performance Cloud, the Cornerstone Learning Cloud and the Cornerstone Extended Enterprise Cloud. Our clients use our solution to source and recruit top talent, develop employees throughout their careers, engage employees effectively, improve business execution, cultivate future leaders, and integrate with their external networks of customers, vendors and distributors. We currently empower more than 10.5 million users across 189 countries and in 38 languages. www.csod.com
Note: Cornerstone® and Cornerstone OnDemand® are registered trademarks of Cornerstone OnDemand Inc.
Forward-looking Statements
This release contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding Cornerstone OnDemand’s future financial performance, market growth, the demand for and benefits from the use of Cornerstone OnDemand’s solutions, and general business conditions. Any forward-looking statements contained in this press release are based upon Cornerstone OnDemand’s historical performance and its current plans, estimates and expectations and are not a representation that such plans, estimates, or expectations will be achieved. These forward-looking statements represent Cornerstone OnDemand’s expectations as of the date of this press release. Subsequent events may cause these expectations to change, and Cornerstone OnDemand disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements in the future. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from Cornerstone OnDemand’s current expectations. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, our ability to attract new clients; the extent to which clients renew their subscriptions for our solution; our ability to compete as the talent management provider for organizations of all sizes; changes in the proportion of our client base that is comprised of enterprise or mid-sized organizations; our ability to manage our growth, including additional headcount and entry into new geographies; the timing and success of solutions offered by our competitors; unpredictable macro-economic conditions; reductions in information technology spending; the success of our new product and service introductions; a disruption in our hosting network infrastructure; costs and reputational harm that could result from defects in our solution; the success of our strategic relationships with third parties; the loss of any of our key employees; increased demands on our infrastructure and costs associated with operating as a public company; failure to protect our intellectual property; acts of terrorism or other vandalism, war or natural disasters; changes in current tax or accounting rules; unanticipated costs or liabilities related to businesses that we acquire; and other risks and uncertainties. Further information on factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated by our forward-looking statements is included in Cornerstone OnDemand’s reports filed with the SEC, including its Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 14, 2012.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To supplement its consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, Cornerstone OnDemand has provided in this release certain measures that have not been prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures include (i) non-GAAP revenue, which is defined as gross revenue plus revenue not recognized in the period due to the impact of purchase accounting rules on deferred revenue acquired through acquisitions, (ii) bookings, which are defined as gross revenue plus the change in deferred revenue for the period, (iii) non-GAAP net cash provided by operating activities, which excludes acquisition and acquisition-related costs and employer-related taxes from stock-based compensation, (iv) non-GAAP net loss and non-GAAP net loss per share, which are based on non-GAAP revenue and exclude, for the periods in which they are present, stock-based compensation and employer-related payroll taxes, amortization of intangible assets, acquisition costs, adjustments to taxes related to acquisition adjustments, amortization of debt discount and issuance costs, early debt retirement expense, change in the fair value of preferred stock warrant liabilities, and accretion related to preferred stock, and (v) non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin, which are calculated based on non-GAAP revenue and exclude stock-based compensation and amortization of certain intangible assets reflected in cost of revenue.
Cornerstone OnDemand’s management uses these non-GAAP financial measures internally in analyzing its financial results and believes they are useful to investors, as a supplement to the corresponding GAAP measures, in evaluating Cornerstone OnDemand’s ongoing operational performance and trends and in comparing its financial measures with other companies in the same industry, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to help investors understand the operational performance of their businesses. However, it is important to note that the particular items Cornerstone excludes from, or includes in, its non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the items excluded from, or included in, similar non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies in the same industry.
Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to such GAAP measures has been provided in the tables included as part of this press release.
|
Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. |
||||||||||||
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 76,442 | $ | 85,409 | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | 47,528 | 34,110 | ||||||||||
| Deferred commissions | 9,354 | 3,537 | ||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net | 8,249 | 3,789 | ||||||||||
| Total current assets | 141,573 | 126,845 | ||||||||||
| Capitalized software development, net | 7,007 | 4,106 | ||||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 7,947 | 3,663 | ||||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | 6,887 | 609 | ||||||||||
| Goodwill | 8,193 | - | ||||||||||
| Other assets, net | 227 | 139 | ||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 171,834 | $ | 135,362 | ||||||||
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 4,849 | $ | 3,834 | ||||||||
| Accrued expenses | 14,986 | 8,039 | ||||||||||
| Deferred revenue, current portion | 87,759 | 52,338 | ||||||||||
| Capital lease obligations, current portion | 1,643 | 1,617 | ||||||||||
| Debt, current portion | 916 | 265 | ||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 3,885 | 996 | ||||||||||
| Total current liabilities |
114,038 |
67,089 | ||||||||||
| Other liabilities, non-current | 3,592 | 806 | ||||||||||
| Deferred revenue, net of current portion | 4,493 | 3,542 | ||||||||||
| Capital lease obligations, net of current portion | 1,227 | 1,056 | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | 1,836 | 409 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 125,186 | 72,902 | ||||||||||
| Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||
| Common stock | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 242,767 | 226,916 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | (196,041 | ) | (164,651 | ) | ||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (83 | ) | 190 | |||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 46,648 | 62,460 | ||||||||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 171,834 | $ | 135,362 | ||||||||
| Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended
December 31, |
Year Ended
December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gross revenue | $ | 36,426 | $ | 22,386 | $ | 117,914 | $ | 75,522 | ||||||||||||||
|
Common stock warrant charge 1 |
- | - | - | (2,500 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Net revenue | 36,426 | 22,386 | 117,914 | 73,022 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of revenue 2, 3 |
10,722 | 6,382 | 34,591 | 21,285 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | 25,704 | 16,004 | 83,323 | 51,737 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales and marketing 2 |
21,280 | 13,529 | 73,563 | 45,773 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Research and development 2 | 4,261 | 2,541 | 14,886 | 10,149 | ||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative 2 | 7,566 | 4,545 | 25,912 | 15,122 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of certain acquired intangible assets | 251 | - | 739 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 33,358 | 20,615 | 115,100 | 71,044 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss from operations | (7,654 | ) | (4,611 | ) | (31,777 | ) | (19,307 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | - | 5 | - | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (84 | ) | (105 | ) | (442 | ) | (902 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liabilities | - | - | - | (42,559 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Withdrawn secondary offering expense | - | - | - | (555 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Other, net | 82 | (196 | ) | 40 | (416 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | (2 | ) | (296 | ) | (402 | ) | (44,412 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Loss before income tax benefit (provision) | (7,656 | ) | (4,907 | ) | (32,179 | ) | (63,719 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit (provision) | 239 | (49 | ) | 789 | (181 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | (7,417 | ) | (4,956 | ) | (31,390 | ) | (63,900 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Accretion of redeemable preferred stock | - | - | - | (5,208 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (7,417 | ) | $ | (4,956 | ) | $ | (31,390 | ) | $ | (69,108 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.63 | ) | $ | (1.74 | ) | ||||||||||
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 50,486 | 48,597 | 49,929 | 39,824 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
1 |
During the second quarter of 2011, we recorded a $2.5 million reduction of revenue associated with a common stock warrant to ADP. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 |
Includes stock-based compensation and employer-related taxes as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended
December 31, |
Year Ended
December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | $ | 356 | $ | 421 | $ | 1,669 | $ | 597 | ||||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 1,800 | 597 | 4,101 | 1,422 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | 354 | 152 | 982 | 765 | ||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 1,494 | 702 | 5,652 | 2,047 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,004 | $ | 1,872 | $ | 12,404 | $ | 4,831 | ||||||||||||||
|
3 |
Cost of revenue includes amortization of intangible assets as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended
December 31, |
Year Ended
December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | $ | 305 | $ | 32 | $ | 964 | $ | 128 | ||||||||||||||
| Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. | |||||||||||||||
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (7,417 | ) | $ | (4,956 | ) | $ | (31,390 | ) | $ | (63,900 | ) | |||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 2,098 | 1,019 | 7,037 | 3,714 | |||||||||||
| Non-cash interest expense | 37 | 61 | 143 | 579 | |||||||||||
| Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liabilities | - | - | - | 42,559 | |||||||||||
| Charges related to the issuance of common stock warrant | - | - | - | 2,500 | |||||||||||
| Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss | (145 | ) | 202 | (182 | ) | 460 | |||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 3,909 | 1,543 | 12,206 | 4,502 | |||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (398 | ) | - | (1,050 | ) | - | |||||||||
| Withdrawn secondary offering expense | - | - | - | 555 | |||||||||||
| Non-cash charitable contribution of common stock | - | - | - | 193 | |||||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition: | |||||||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | (2,196 | ) | (11,111 | ) | (12,254 | ) | (13,308 | ) | |||||||
| Deferred commissions | (5,119 | ) | (728 | ) | (5,691 | ) | (1,274 | ) | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | (780 | ) | (272 | ) | (4,188 | ) | (1,804 | ) | |||||||
| Accounts payable | (1,466 | ) | 566 | 190 | 915 | ||||||||||
| Accrued expenses | 5,201 | 1,535 | 6,325 | 3,314 | |||||||||||
| Deferred revenue | 19,584 | 16,076 | 35,327 | 22,161 | |||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 780 | 937 | 3,822 | 666 | |||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 14,088 | 4,872 | 10,295 | 1,832 | |||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property and equipment | (1,776 | ) | - | (2,123 | ) | (784 | ) | ||||||||
| Capitalized software costs | (1,368 | ) | (741 | ) | (5,030 | ) | (3,022 | ) | |||||||
| Purchase of available-for-sale securities | - | - | - | (34,079 | ) | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities | - | 17,000 | - | 34,000 | |||||||||||
| Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired | - | - | (12,428 | ) | - | ||||||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (3,144 | ) | 16,259 | (19,581 | ) | (3,885 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from initial public offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions | - | - | - | 90,539 | |||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock upon warrant exercises | - | - | - | 3,163 | |||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of debt | 1,043 | - | 1,043 | 669 | |||||||||||
| Payments of initial public offering costs | - | - | - | (3,436 | ) | ||||||||||
| Payments of withdrawn secondary offering costs | - | - | - | (555 | ) | ||||||||||
| Repayment of debt | (260 | ) | (56 | ) | (1,510 | ) | (9,207 | ) | |||||||
| Principal payments under capital lease obligations | (523 | ) | (818 | ) | (1,919 | ) | (1,977 | ) | |||||||
| Payments of withholding tax on net exercise of stock-based awards | - | - | - | (48 | ) | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from stock option and warrant exercises | 714 | 876 | 2,697 | 1,491 | |||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 974 | 2 | 311 | 80,639 | |||||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 32 | (99 | ) | 8 | (244 | ) | |||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 11,950 | 21,034 | (8,967 | ) | 78,342 | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 64,492 | 64,375 | 85,409 | 7,067 | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 76,442 | $ | 85,409 | $ | 76,442 | $ | 85,409 | |||||||
| Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||
| RECONCILIATIONS OF REVENUE TO NON-GAAP REVENUE AND GROSS MARGIN TO NON-GAAP GROSS MARGIN | |||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
Year Ended |
||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Gross revenue | $ | 36,426 | $ | 22,386 | $ | 117,914 | $ | 75,522 | |||||||||||
| Common stock warrant charge 1 | - | - | - | (2,500 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net revenue | 36,426 | 22,386 | 117,914 | 73,022 | |||||||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | 10,722 | 6,382 | 34,591 | 21,285 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 25,704 | $ | 16,004 | $ | 83,323 | $ | 51,737 | |||||||||||
| Gross margin | 70.6 | % | 71.5 | % | 70.7 | % | 70.9 | % | |||||||||||
| Net revenue | $ | 36,426 | $ | 22,386 | $ | 117,914 | $ | 73,022 | |||||||||||
| Adjustments to net revenue | |||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock warrant charge 1 | - | - | - | 2,500 | |||||||||||||||
| Adjustments to revenue 2 | 293 | - | 1,440 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Total adjustments to net revenue | 293 | - | 1,440 | 2,500 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP revenue | $ | 36,719 | $ | 22,386 | $ | 119,354 | $ | 75,522 | |||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | $ | 10,722 | $ | 6,382 | $ | 34,591 | $ | 21,285 | |||||||||||
| Adjustments to costs of revenue | |||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | (305 | ) | (32 | ) | (964 | ) | (128 | ) | |||||||||||
| Stock based compensation and employer-related taxes | (356 | ) | (421 | ) | (1,669 | ) | (597 | ) | |||||||||||
| Total adjustments to cost of revenue | (661 | ) | (453 | ) | (2,633 | ) | (725 | ) | |||||||||||
| Non-GAAP costs of revenue | 10,061 | 5,929 | 31,958 | 20,560 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP gross profit | $ | 26,658 | $ | 16,457 | $ | 87,396 | $ | 54,962 | |||||||||||
| Non-GAAP gross margin | 72.6 | % | 73.5 | % | 73.2 | % | 72.8 | % | |||||||||||
|
1 |
During the second quarter of 2011, we recorded a $2.5 million reduction of revenue associated with a common stock warrant to ADP. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2 |
Due to purchase accounting rules, upon acquisition, Cornerstone recorded an adjustment of $1.6 million to reduce the balance of deferred revenue related to the assumed client contracts acquired from Sonar Limited. As a result of this adjustment, $0.3 million and $1.4 million of revenue was not recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2012, respectively. Therefore, revenue is adjusted by an increase of $0.3 million and $1.4 million to arrive at non-GAAP revenue for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2012, respectively. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| RECONCILIATIONS OF NET LOSS TO NON-GAAP NET LOSS AND NON-GAAP NET LOSS PER SHARE | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
Year Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (7,417 | ) | $ | (4,956 | ) | $ | (31,390 | ) | $ | (63,900 | ) | ||||||||||
| Adjustments to net loss | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock warrant charge | - | - | - | 2,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation and employer-related payroll taxes | 4,004 | 1,872 | 12,404 | 4,831 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition related: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjustments to revenue 1 | 293 | - | 1,440 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 492 | - | 1,446 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition costs | - | - | 747 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Adjustments to benefit (provision) for income taxes 2 | (302 | ) | - | (964 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liabilities | - | - | - | 42,559 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Withdrawn secondary offering expense | - | - | - | 555 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other amortization costs and other expenses | 64 | 70 | 358 | 748 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total adjustments to net loss | 4,551 | 1,942 | 15,431 | 51,193 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP net loss | $ | (2,866 | ) | $ | (3,014 | ) | $ | (15,959 | ) | $ | (12,707 | ) | ||||||||||
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 50,486 | 48,597 | 49,929 | 39,824 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP net loss per share | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | ||||||||||
|
1 |
As of December 31, 2012, approximately $0.3 million and $1.4 million in estimated revenues were not recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2012, respectively, due to purchase accounting rules. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 |
Income tax effects related to acquisition related adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. | ||||||||
| CALCULATIONS OF BOOKINGS (DEFINED AS GROSS REVENUE PLUS CHANGE IN DEFERRED REVENUE) | ||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||
|
Deferred Revenue |
Three Months Ended |
|||||||
| Gross revenue | $ | 36,426 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue at September 30, 2012 | $ | 72,622 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue at December 31, 2012 | 92,252 | |||||||
| Change in deferred revenue | 19,630 | 19,630 | ||||||
| Bookings | $ | 56,056 | ||||||
|
Deferred Revenue |
Three Months Ended |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Gross revenue | $ | 22,386 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue at September 30, 2011 | $ | 39,875 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue at December 31, 2011 | 55,880 | |||||||
| Change in deferred revenue | 16,005 | 16,005 | ||||||
| Bookings | $ | 38,391 | ||||||
| Percentage period-over-period increase in bookings for the three months ended December 31, 2012 |
|
46 |
% |
|||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Deferred Revenue |
Year Ended |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Gross revenue | $ | 117,914 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue at December 31, 2011 | $ | 55,880 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue at December 31, 2012 | 92,252 | |||||||
| Change in deferred revenue | 36,372 | 36,372 | ||||||
| Bookings | $ | 154,286 | ||||||
|
Deferred Revenue |
Year Ended |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Gross revenue | $ | 75,522 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue at December 31, 2010 | $ | 33,818 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue at December 31, 2011 | 55,880 | |||||||
| Change in deferred revenue | 22,062 | 22,062 | ||||||
| Bookings | $ | 97,584 | ||||||
| Percentage period-over-period increase in bookings for the year ended December 31, 2012 |
58 |
% |
||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||
| RECONCILIATIONS OF NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES TO NON-GAAP NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING | ||||||||||||||||||
| ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
Year Ended |
|||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 14,088 | $ | 4,872 | $ | 10,295 | $ | 1,832 | ||||||||||
| Payment of acquisition related costs | - | - | 747 | - | ||||||||||||||
| Payment of employer related taxes from stock-based compensation | 95 | 329 | 198 | 329 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 14,183 | $ | 5,201 | $ | 11,240 | $ | 2,161 | ||||||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities 1 | $ | (3,144 | ) | $ | 16,259 | $ | (19,581 | ) | $ | (3,885 | ) | |||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | 974 | $ | 2 | $ | 311 | $ | 80,639 | ||||||||||
|
1 |
Includes purchases of property and equipment and capitalized software development costs. | |||||||||||||||||
Published February 12, 2013 Reads 428
Copyright © 2013 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Business Wire
Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
At pennies per virtual machine-hour, the economics of cloud computing are both compelling and daunting to replicate. Whether you are building your own cloud infrastructure, building a public cloud or choosing a cloud service, there are key strategy and technology decisions that make the difference between success and failure.
In his General Session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Jason Waxman, VP in the Intel Architecture Group and general manager of the Cloud Platforms Group within Inte...May. 25, 2013 10:00 AM EDT Reads: 868 |
By Elizabeth White You're getting pitched every day from your legacy enterprise software and hardware vendors about "cloud." They're doing an amazing job of convincing your CIO and CTO about what cloud is and how you should use it. The reality is they're defending their shrinking market share and keeping you on the legacy treadmill for as long as they can by selling you solutions that aren't "cloud."
In her session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Niki Acosta, Cloud Evangelista for Rackspace, will talk thro...May. 25, 2013 10:00 AM EDT Reads: 833 |
By Jeremy Geelan The rise of cloud computing has exposed hard drive-based storage as the new data center bottleneck. Combating this, data center managers have deployed SSDs to gain the performance needed to provide real-time access to data. However, due to budget constraints, many have turned to consumer-grade SSDs without understanding that they wear out quickly when processing enterprise workloads. In this session, Esther Spanjer will discuss recent endurance advancements in SSD technology that enable usage of...May. 25, 2013 10:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,748 |
By Elizabeth White SYS-CON Events announced today that Wowrack will exhibit at SYS-CON's 12th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 10–13, 2013, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York.
Wowrack’s core expertise lies in high-availability Private and Public Cloud IaaS Hosting Solutions. Wowrack provides a true Hybrid service – where business release all IT management and hardware provisioning – taking the data center and server system administrative headaches off our customer’s shoulders. ...May. 25, 2013 10:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,382 |
By Liz McMillan Organizations across the world are increasingly starting to see the benefits of moving more and more services to the cloud. The focus on the cost-saving potential of cloud is rapidly shifting to completely transforming the business with cloud. As organizations are investing enormous sums on technology they are starting to realize that in order to maximize the return on investment and accelerate the business transformation process the first area of focus should be people. By ensuring the organiza...May. 25, 2013 09:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,166 |
By Jeremy Geelan "Since Cloud Expo is running the week of June 10, we thought it'd be a great idea to schedule our Meetup this week. That way, if you have colleagues, friends, or family in town that week for the Expo, you can invite them to join you!" With those words, the OpenStack New York Meetup Group's organizer's launched a landing page this week where anyone interested can register for the June 12 evening event.May. 25, 2013 09:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,136 |
By Jeremy Geelan Organizations want extraordinary results from their IT units. Today's mantra is faster delivery, better quality, cheaper solutions, and safer environments. Many CIOs are implementing cloud computing enterprise architectures to address these challenges with results varying greatly. Why are some organizations seeing only limited results from cloud computing implementations while others are increasing market share, decreasing costs, generating value, and innovating faster? May. 25, 2013 09:00 AM EDT Reads: 3,625 |
By Jeremy Geelan Everyone is virtualizing, but are they realizing any of the promised savings? This overview of IBM's new virtualization optimization solutions will show you how integrated Cloud Solutions like SmartCloud Provisioning and SmartCloud Monitoring can deliver the savings virtualization promises.
Organizations are using intelligent management and analytics to provide the insight needed to optimize their virtualized infrastructure and dramatically improve availability, reduce data storage footprint...May. 25, 2013 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,484 |
By Jeremy Geelan “Big Data analytics will shape the form of nearly every process going forward in time, from the color of the latest fashions, what the candidates say in one town versus another to the chemical composition of the latest super drug,” noted Steve Knodl, Director of Product Management at NextIO, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “Whether these are considered “new” products,” Knodl continued, “or continuous improvement on previous processes is largely in the eyes o...May. 25, 2013 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 6,817 |
By Elizabeth White In an ideal developer/systems administrator’s world, most applications would deploy seamlessly to multiple platforms and scale elastically with minimal effort bringing the unprecedented agility of the cloud within immediate reach of developer teams and IT organizations.
OpenStack, a RackSpace and NASA initiative, is now managed by an independent foundation and is supported by multiple vendors. It defines APIs for compute, storage, networking, services, monitoring, and additional infrastructure...May. 25, 2013 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,088 |
- Cloud People: A Who's Who of Cloud Computing
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Dave Linthicum – Cloud Technology Partners
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Is Changing the Economics of Business
- Windows Azure IaaS Reaches General Availability
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Nicos Vekiarides – TwinStrata
- AMD and Adobe Collaborate on Upcoming Version of Adobe Premiere Pro Software to Enable Breakthrough Video Editing Performance Through Open Standards
- State and Local Governments Adopt Microsoft Dynamics CRM to Improve Citizen Service Delivery
- Enterasys Spotlights SDN's Impact on Traditional Networking in Upcoming Webinar
- New Relic Q1 2013 Blazes Past Growth Targets and Reaches 40,000 Active Customer Accounts
- Best CIO Practices Shared from SHI’s Customers
- Cloud Expo New York: Deploying Hybrid Cloud for Performance and Uptime
- Cloud Expo New York: Delivering Digital Marketing on the Cloud
- Cloud People: A Who's Who of Cloud Computing
- Cloud Expo New York: Best CIO Practices Shared from SHI’s Customers
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Dave Linthicum – Cloud Technology Partners
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Is Changing the Economics of Business
- Cloud Expo New York: How to Use Google Apps Script
- Windows Azure IaaS Reaches General Availability
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Nicos Vekiarides – TwinStrata
- AMD and Adobe Collaborate on Upcoming Version of Adobe Premiere Pro Software to Enable Breakthrough Video Editing Performance Through Open Standards
- Cloud Computing Bootcamp at Cloud Expo New York
- State and Local Governments Adopt Microsoft Dynamics CRM to Improve Citizen Service Delivery
- Enterasys Spotlights SDN's Impact on Traditional Networking in Upcoming Webinar
- New Relic Q1 2013 Blazes Past Growth Targets and Reaches 40,000 Active Customer Accounts
- The Top 150 Players in Cloud Computing
- What is Cloud Computing?
- Six Benefits of Cloud Computing
- The Top 250 Players in the Cloud Computing Ecosystem
- Twenty-One Experts Define Cloud Computing
- What's the Difference Between Cloud Computing and SaaS?
- The Future of Cloud Computing
- Virtualization Conference Keynote Webcast Live on SYS-CON.TV
- A Brief History of Cloud Computing: Is the Cloud There Yet?
- GDS International: Global Warming Scam?
- Cloud Expo Europe 2009 in Prague: Themes & Topics
- Cloud Computing Expo 2009 West: Call for Papers Now Closed








You're getting pitched every day from your legacy enterprise software and hardware vendors about "cloud." They're doing an amazing job of convincing your CIO and CTO about what cloud is and how you should use it. The reality is they're defending their shrinking market share and keeping you on the legacy treadmill for as long as they can by selling you solutions that aren't "cloud."
In her session at the 12th International Cloud Expo, Niki Acosta, Cloud Evangelista for Rackspace, will talk thro...
The rise of cloud computing has exposed hard drive-based storage as the new data center bottleneck. Combating this, data center managers have deployed SSDs to gain the performance needed to provide real-time access to data. However, due to budget constraints, many have turned to consumer-grade SSDs without understanding that they wear out quickly when processing enterprise workloads. In this session, Esther Spanjer will discuss recent endurance advancements in SSD technology that enable usage of...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Wowrack will exhibit at SYS-CON's 12th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 10–13, 2013, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York.
Wowrack’s core expertise lies in high-availability Private and Public Cloud IaaS Hosting Solutions. Wowrack provides a true Hybrid service – where business release all IT management and hardware provisioning – taking the data center and server system administrative headaches off our customer’s shoulders. ...
Organizations across the world are increasingly starting to see the benefits of moving more and more services to the cloud. The focus on the cost-saving potential of cloud is rapidly shifting to completely transforming the business with cloud. As organizations are investing enormous sums on technology they are starting to realize that in order to maximize the return on investment and accelerate the business transformation process the first area of focus should be people. By ensuring the organiza...
"Since Cloud Expo is running the week of June 10, we thought it'd be a great idea to schedule our Meetup this week. That way, if you have colleagues, friends, or family in town that week for the Expo, you can invite them to join you!" With those words, the OpenStack New York Meetup Group's organizer's launched a landing page this week where anyone interested can register for the June 12 evening event.
Organizations want extraordinary results from their IT units. Today's mantra is faster delivery, better quality, cheaper solutions, and safer environments. Many CIOs are implementing cloud computing enterprise architectures to address these challenges with results varying greatly. Why are some organizations seeing only limited results from cloud computing implementations while others are increasing market share, decreasing costs, generating value, and innovating faster?
Everyone is virtualizing, but are they realizing any of the promised savings? This overview of IBM's new virtualization optimization solutions will show you how integrated Cloud Solutions like SmartCloud Provisioning and SmartCloud Monitoring can deliver the savings virtualization promises.
Organizations are using intelligent management and analytics to provide the insight needed to optimize their virtualized infrastructure and dramatically improve availability, reduce data storage footprint...
“Big Data analytics will shape the form of nearly every process going forward in time, from the color of the latest fashions, what the candidates say in one town versus another to the chemical composition of the latest super drug,” noted Steve Knodl, Director of Product Management at NextIO, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan. “Whether these are considered “new” products,” Knodl continued, “or continuous improvement on previous processes is largely in the eyes o...
In an ideal developer/systems administrator’s world, most applications would deploy seamlessly to multiple platforms and scale elastically with minimal effort bringing the unprecedented agility of the cloud within immediate reach of developer teams and IT organizations.
OpenStack, a RackSpace and NASA initiative, is now managed by an independent foundation and is supported by multiple vendors. It defines APIs for compute, storage, networking, services, monitoring, and additional infrastructure...
Although often misunderstood, cloud computing ultimately relies on the same technological underpinnings as traditional server and storage options. While software, platforms and even infrastructure are farmed out to third-party providers, their ability to operate efficiently is constrained by the sam...
Hyper-V Replica is our included asynchronous site-to-site VM replication capability for Windows Server 2012 and our free Hyper-V Server 2012 bare-metal enterprise-grade hypervisor. Using Hyper-V Replica, you can quickly implement a cost-effective disaster recovery plan for your business critical VM...
While movement to the cloud keeps accelerating, fears about security hang on. Let’s take a look at the most common myths about cloud security that might be holding businesses back from taking advantage of the flexibility and scalability of the cloud model.
This is the piece of “common sense” that h...
Imagine if you could take a time machine five years into the future, so that you would know which of today’s new technologies panned out and which did not.
Most companies have only started using cloud in the past two years. But there are some companies that have been using cloud for five years or...
“The last time I checked, people do not change their social security numbers very often...”
While in constant debate over data encryption and ease of access, I encountered a train of thought that made my jaw drop. A tradeshow attendee suggested encrypting everything, but just use a weak algorithm; ...
Don and I have four children, all of whom have had the fortune to take piano lessons (I'm not sure if the youngest would agree he's fortunate at this point in his life but at five, he's not really able to answer the question with any degree of wisdom, anyway. Come to think of it, not sure the other ...
Our prior post, A Roadmap to High-Value Cloud Infrastructure: Disaster Recovery and Data Protection, discussed both the benefits and limitations of a cloud-based disaster recovery (DR) strategy. As we highlighted last week, traditional disaster recovery options leave open a huge hole: At one extreme...
Online collaboration has evolved during the last decade, delivering even greater value -- thanks to a new generation of business technology applications. Forbes Insights released "Collaborating in the Cloud," a Cisco-sponsored study examining the ways business leaders increasingly look at cloud coll...
New technologies allow schools, colleges and universities to analyze absolutely everything that happens. From student behavior, testing results, career development of students as well as educational needs based on changing societies. A lot of this data has already been stored and is used for statist...
A recent Gartner study states that the function of the modern CIO is in flux and that his or her future focus must incorporate digital assets (aka cloud-based data and applications) to remain relevant. Towards the goal of riding the sea change a compiler of stacks to a broker of business needs, secu...













